Reznet

Learn, Practice. Succeed. Study Journalism at AIJI. Application deadline is Feb. 1, 2008

RedClout image

Obama, McCain Fight Will Test Indian Ideals

No votes yet
  • Print

As the Democratic nomination race edges closer to a conclusion, Native people are increasingly faced with a new question.

Should they support Sen. Barack Obama or Sen. John McCain?

Inevitably, that question leads to another: Why do Native Americans typically vote Democratic?

This year, more than any other I can remember, that question must be asked.

It's widely accepted that Native people vote Democratic. Most state and national Democratic politicians, from former President Bill Clinton to Sen. Tim Johnson of South Dakota, have enjoyed strong Native support.

That's especially true in states with significant Native populations like Arizona, New Mexico, Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota, where Indians have often provided the swing vote for Democratic politicians seeking higher office.

Then there's McCain, an Arizona senator who has consistently defied the odds, having served as chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee and proven himself a powerful voice for Native causes during his time in the Senate.

When he ran for president in 2000, McCain enjoyed significant support from tribal leaders for making Indian issues a priority in his campaign.

Impossible to dismiss as a potential White House ally to Indians, McCain will force many tribal leaders in the coming months to question exactly what Democrats have done for Native people.

For some, the answer will be simple: plenty.

This year, the evidence can be seen in the pivotal Indian Health Care Improvement Act, which reauthorized many tribal health programs and which was introduced and spearheaded by Democratic Sen. Byron Dorgan of North Dakota. Yet, many Republican senators co-sponsored that bill and voted to approve it.

Perhaps the greatest challenge facing McCain will be distancing himself from the current administration on Indian issues. Many tribal leaders have seen President George W. Bush as unwilling to accept his trust responsibility toward Indians.

That unwillingness has been most evident in the vast funding cuts that Indian programs have seen during Bush's term.

According to a 2003 U.S. Commission on Civil Rights report, the Bureau of Indian Affairs' budget declined considerably between 2000 and 2002, including a nearly 7 percent decrease in its funding for tribal priority grants for basic services such as child welfare.

Earlier this year, Bush proposed a host of budget cuts to Indian programs, including a $177 million reduction in the BIA education construction fund and a $22 million cut to the Indian Health Facilities fund, frustrating tribal leaders.

So, should he seek to gain tribal leaders' endorsements this year, look for McCain to identify key differences between himself and Bush when it comes to Native issues.

Also look for him to begin finding tribal leaders to endorse his candidacy, the way Obama and Hillary Clinton already have. Likely, McCain has already found tribal leaders willing to support him.

For Obama, the test will be whether Indians see him as a strong enough to defeat McCain and whether he understands Native issues as well as a man who spent years introducing and fighting for Indian legislation.

Obama certainly is on the right track, having enlisted the help of Native people at all levels of his campaign.

Regardless of whom they endorse in the general election, Native people can only gain from questioning their ideals and asking themselves whether any party deserves their unconditional support.

Kevin Abourezk, Oglala Lakota, is a reporter and editor at the Lincoln (Neb.) Journal Star. He is a reznet assignment editor and teaches reporting at the Freedom Forum's American Indian Journalism Institute.

To send Kevin Abourezk a message please click here

Obama vs. McCain

When Obama gave that famous convention speech, when he ticked off the list of minorities, he omitted Native Americans; they were not mentioned in that speech. So maybe he's come to the table very late in life. This troubles me.

Re: Why Indians vote democratic

I equate Republicanism with racism. George Bush is the worst president ever, nothing good can come from Republicanism. I've never seen it and I've been here almost fifty years.

While you may equate Bush

While you may equate Bush with racism, the Democrats consistently take the Native vote for grant and do not match their rhetoric with actions. For instance while Sen. Obama has only recently stated that he opposes Congress and the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) intervening in the Cherokee-Freedmen issue, he prefaces that on the outcome of the ongoing court casing, which implies that if the Freedmen are not successful in their case, then the CBC should get involved. This despite having a member of the Cherokee, Rosebud, and Crow tribes on his campaign staff.

Another example of Democratic duplicity to Native people is Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) stating that the House should not re-authorize the Native American Housing and Self-Determination act (H.R. 2786), which not only punishes the Cherokee Nation, but other tribes that still rely upon government assistance to meet the basic needs of their people. Talk about using a butcher knife when a scalpel might be used.

This ignores the Supreme Court decision Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez (1978) in which the Supreme Court stated that "federal remedy ...is plainly not required to give effect to Congress' objective of extending constitutional norms of tribal self-government. So which is it Democrats, tribes are sovereign, but only when they do what you want? Sounds like neo-colonialism to me.

With regards to Sen. McCain, yes he was once a staunch supporter and ally to Indian Country, but in his quest for the presidency he has abandoned tribes especially after the Abramoff scandal and has been backtracking ever since. Another point to ponder, if McCain seeks endorsements from fire and brinestone evangelical preachers who see Catholicism as a religion of whores and gays as source of God's wrath on America causing Katrina & 9/11, I wonder what they think of Native people who practice their own beliefs

In conclusion no one really wins with a two party system and Natives suffer along with the rest of the Nation. Funny how a society of consumer choices likes dozens of brands of bread, automobiles or soda pop, only gives Native people a lesser of two evils to choose from.

At least Nixon gave land back to tribes, fought federal cases on behalf of tribes, and kept the military from intervening at Wounded Knee.

I certainly agree with you

I certainly agree with you regarding Barney Frank. The man actually had the nerve to state on the floor of the House that cutting Cherokee funding would show Native Americans that we are serious about enforcing treaties...it would be good for Native Americans. Frank refuses to acknowledge clear evidence that Congress abrogated that treaty, including provisions on citizenship, more than a hundred years ago when they took away Cherokee land and paralyzed the Cherokee government for over seventy years.

That said, I read Obama's statement differently. He said very clearly the federal government must respect Indian rights to self-governance even when they disagree. And that he is more interested in broken treaty promises made TO Indians. To me this says that he is willing to stand by his promises to support tribal self-determination even when it is controversial to do so.

TERMINATED MIXED BLOODS OF UTAH

SURE WISH YOU WOULD PUBLISH NEWS ABOUT US THE WAY YOU
DO OTHER TRIBES AND PEOPLE...
YOU SHOULD REALIZE THAT "TERMINATION" IS A SCARY WORD
THAT IS FLOATING AROUND OUT THERE IN INDIAN COUNTY...
AND AS LONG AS THE LAW IS OPEN THAT TERMINATED ME AND MY
PEOPLE IT "ALIVE AND BREATHING" FOR "ANY" OTHER TRIBE THE
GOVERNMENT WANTS TO "TERMINATE..."
I WOULD BE VERY AFRAID IF I WERE A NON TERMINATED INDIAN
TODAY...
LEAR FROM US WHAT TERMINATION DONE TO US AND THAT IT IS
"NOT GOOD" FOR ANY INDIAN OR TRIBES...

wwwundeclaredutes.net

THANKS,
ORANNA B. FELTER, TERMINATED MIXED BLOOD UINTA OF UTAH
LEAD PLAINTIFF IN FELTER V. KEMPTHORNE

Maybe you should find some

Maybe you should find some African-American and/or Jewish members who were terminated along with you, maybe then you'd find supporters and be given some press coverage. But be sure to seek out Congressional members who don't reside in your state to complain to.

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <cite> <code> <p> <i> <u> <strike> <ul> <li> <ol> <a> <img> <sup> <sub> <hr> <table> <caption> <tbody> <tr> <td>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

  • Tell us what you think about the 'Navajobama' T-shirt, and we'll send your comments to the manufacturer—and to the Obama for President campaign. (No profanities, please.)
  • A Native American gay wedding ceremony takes place at a Two Spirit gathering in Montana.
  • Omission disappoints Native Americans attending the presidential candidate's speech in Wisconsin. Others express concern over Obama's stance on Indian gaming.
  • Here's how our petite, 5-foot-4 Navajo reporter managed to elbow her way through a mob of crazed sports journalists and ask the Super Bowl superstar what he knows about Indian people. And as for that football player who looked down her blouse ...
  • Floyd Red Crow Westerman's death has left a void in Indian Country and a burden Native people must find a way to shoulder in his absence.

Sponsors:


Copyright © 2008 Reznet.
Reznet is a project of The University of Montana School of Journalism.
Comments?